Tickets For George Strait at Tiger Stadium - Baton Rouge in Baton Rouge, LA in Baton Rouge, Louisiana For Sale

GEORGE STRAIT A Farewell Tour Tickets- xxxx
xxxx One study found that the contributor base to Wikipedia "was barely 13% women; the average age of a contributor was in the mid-20s". A xxxx study by researchers from the University of Minnesota found that females comprised 16.1% of the 38,497 editors who started editing Wikipedia during xxxx.[99] In a January xxxx New York Times article, Noam Cohen observed that just 13% of Wikipedia's contributors are female, according to a xxxx Wikimedia Foundation survey.[100] Sue Gardner, executive director of the Wikimedia Foundation, hopes to see female editing contributions increase to twenty-five percent by xxxx.[101] Linda Basch, president of the National Council for Research on Women, noted the contrast in these Wikipedia editor statistics with the percentage of women currently completing bachelor's degrees, master's degrees and PhD programs in the United States (all at rates of fifty percent or greater).[102]In a research article published in PLoS ONE in xxxx, Yasseri et al., using the circadian patterns of editorial activities of the community, have estimated the share of contributions to different editions of Wikipedia from different regions of the world. For instance, it has been reported that edits from North America are limited to almost 50% in the English Wikipedia and this value decreases to twenty-five percent in simple English Wikipedia. The article also covers some other editions in different languages.[103] The Wikimedia Foundation hopes to increase the number of editors in the Global South to thirty-seven percent by xxxx.[104]There are currently 287 language editions (or language versions) of Wikipedia; of these, nine have over one million articles each (English, Dutch, German, French, Italian, Polish, Spanish, Russian and Swedish), six more have over 700,000 articles (Cebuano, Chinese, Japanese, Portuguese, Vietnamese, and Waray-Waray), 32 more have over 100,000 articles, and 75 more have over 10,000 articles.[105][106] The largest, the English Wikipedia, has over 4.3 million articles. As of June xxxx, according to Alexa, the English subdomain (en.wikipedia.org; English Wikipedia) receives approximately 56% of Wikipedia's cumulative traffic, with the remaining split among the other languages (Spanish: 9%; Japanese: 8%; Russian: 6%; German: 5%; French: 4%; Italian: 3%).[5] As of December xxxx, the six largest language editions are (in order of article count) the English, Dutch, German, Swedish, French, and Italian Wikipedias.[107] The coexistence of multilingual content on Wikipedia is made possible by Unicode, whose support was first introduced into Wikipedia in January xxxx by Brion Vibber after he had similarly implemented the alphabet of Esperanto.[108][109]Since Wikipedia is based on the Web and therefore worldwide, contributors of a same language edition may use different dialects or may come from different countries (as is the case for the English edition). These differences may lead to some conflicts over spelling differences (e.g. colour versus color)[110] or points of view.[111]Since Wikipedia is based on the Web and therefore worldwide, contributors of a same language edition may use different dialects or may come from different countries (as is the case for the English edition). These differences may lead to some conflicts over spelling differences (e.g. colour versus color)[110] or points of view.[111]Jimmy Wales has described Wikipedia as "an effort to create and distribute a free encyclopedia of the highest possible quality to every single person on the planet in their own language".[115] Though each language edition functions more or less independently, some efforts are made to supervise them all. They are coordinated in part by Meta-Wiki, the Wikimedia Foundation's wiki devoted to maintaining all of its projects (Wikipedia and others).[116] For instance, Meta-Wiki provides important statistics on all language editions of Wikipedia,[117] and it maintains a list of articles every Wikipedia should have.[118] The list concerns basic content by subject: biography, history, geography, society, culture, science, technology, and mathematics. As for the rest, it is not rare for articles strongly related to a particular language not to have counterparts in another edition. For example, articles about small towns in the United States might only be available in English, even when they meet notability criteria of other language Wikipedia projects.Translated articles represent only a small portion of articles in most editions, in part because fully automated translation of articles is disallowed.[119] Articles available in more than one language may offer "interwiki links", which link to the counterpart articles in other editions.Wikipedia began as a complementary project for Nupedia, a free online English-language encyclopedia project whose articles were written by experts and reviewed under a formal process. Nupedia was founded on March 9, xxxx, under the ownership of Bomis, a web portal company. Its main figures were the Bomis CEO Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger, editor-in-chief for Nupedia and later Wikipedia. Nupedia was licensed initially under its own Nupedia Open Content License, switching to the GNU Free Documentation License before Wikipedia's founding at the urging of Richard Stallman.[120] Sanger and Wales founded Wikipedia.[121][122] While Wales is credited with defining the goal of making a publicly editable encyclopedia,[123][124] Sanger is credited with the strategy of using a wiki to reach that goal.[125] On January 10, xxxx, Sanger proposed on the Nupedia mailing list to create a wiki as a "feeder" project for Nupedia.[126]Wikipedia was formally launched on January 15, xxxx, as a single English-language edition at www.wikipedia.com,[127] and announced by Sanger on the Nupedia mailing list.[123] Wikipedia's policy of "neutral point-of-view"[128] was codified in its initial months. Otherwise, there were relatively few rules initially and Wikipedia operated independently of Nupedia.[123] Originally, Bomis intended to make Wikipedia a business for profit.[129]Wikipedia gained early contributors from Nupedia, Slashdot postings, and web search engine indexing. On August 8, xxxx, Wikipedia had over 8,000 articles.[130] On September 25, xxxx, Wikipedia had over 13,000 articles.[131] And by the end of xxxx it had grown to approximately 20,000 articles and 18 language editions. It had reached 26 language editions by late xxxx, 46 by the end of xxxx, and 161 by the final days of xxxx.[132] Nupedia and Wikipedia coexisted until the former's servers were taken down permanently in xxxx, and its text was incorporated into Wikipedia. English Wikipedia passed the mark of two million articles on September 9, xxxx, making it the largest encyclopedia ever assembled, surpassing even the xxxx Yongle Encyclopedia, which had held the record for 600 years.[133]Citing fears of commercial advertising and lack of control in Wikipedia, users of the Spanish Wikipedia forked from Wikipedia to create the Enciclopedia Libre in February xxxx.[134] These moves encouraged Wales to announce that Wikipedia would not display advertisements, and to change Wikipedia's domain from wikipedia.com to wikipedia.org.[135]Though the English Wikipedia reached three million articles in August xxxx, the growth of the edition, in terms of the numbers of articles and of contributors, appears to have peaked around early xxxx.[136] Around 1,800 articles were added daily to the encyclopedia in xxxx; by xxxx that average was roughly 800.[137] A team at the Palo Alto Research Center attributed this slowing of growth to the project's increasing exclusivity and resistance to change.[138] Others suggest that the growth is flattening naturally because articles that could be called "low-hanging fruit" ? topics that clearly merit an article ? have already been created and built up extensively.[139][140][141]In November xxxx, a researcher at the Rey Juan Carlos University in Madrid (Spain) found that the English Wikipedia had lost 49,000 editors during the first three months of xxxx; in comparison, the project lost only 4,900 editors during the same period in xxxx.[142][143] The Wall Street Journal cited the array of rules applied to editing and disputes related to such content among the reasons for this trend.[144] Wales disputed these claims in xxxx, denying the decline and questioning the methodology of the study.[145] Two years later, Wales acknowledged the presence of a slight decline, noting a decrease from "a little more than 36,000 writers" in June xxxx to 35,800 in June xxxx.[146] In the same interview, Wales also claimed the number of editors was "stable and sustainable," a claim which was questioned by MIT's Technology Review in a xxxx article titled "The Decline of Wikipedia."[147] In July xxxx, the Atlantic reported that the number of administrators is also in decline.[148] In the 25 November xxxx issue of New York magazine, Katherine Ward stated "Wikipedia, the sixth-most-used website, is facing an internal crisis. As MIT's Technology Review revealed recently, since xxxx, the site has lost a third of the volunteer editors who update and correct the online encyclopedia's millions of pages and those still there have focused increasingly on minutiae."[149]In January xxxx, Wikipedia entered for the first time the top-ten list of the most popular websites in the United States, according to comScore Networks. With 42.9 million unique visitors, Wikipedia was ranked number 9, surpassing the New York Times (#10) and Apple (#11). This marked a significant increase over January xxxx, when the rank was number 33, with Wikipedia receiving around 18.3 million unique visitors.[150] As of June xxxx, Wikipedia is the seventh most popular website worldwide according to Alexa Internet,[5] receiving more than 2.7 billion US pageviews every month,[151] out of a global monthly total of over 12 billion pageviews.[152]On January 18, xxxx, the English Wikipedia participated in a series of coordinated protests against two proposed laws in the United States Congress?the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and the PROTECT IP Act (PIPA)?by blacking out its pages for 24 hours.[153] More than 162 million people viewed the blackout explanation page that temporarily replaced Wikipedia content.[154][155]Although poorly written articles are flagged for improvement,[158] critics note that the style and quality of individual articles may vary greatly. Others argue that inherent biases (willful or not) arise in the presentation of facts, especially controversial topics and public or historical figures. Although Wikipedia's stated mission is to provide information and not argue value judgements, articles often contain overly specialized, trivial, or objectionable material.[159]In xxxx, the Wikipedia Watch criticism website listed dozens of examples of plagiarism by Wikipedia editors on the English version.[160] Wales has said in this respect: "We need to deal with such activities with absolute harshness, no mercy, because this kind of plagiarism is 100% at odds with all of our core principles."[160]Articles for traditional encyclopedias such as Encyclopædia Britannica are carefully and deliberately written by experts, lending such encyclopedias a reputation for accuracy. Conversely, Wikipedia is often cited for factual inaccuracies and misrepresentations. However, a report in the journal Nature in xxxx suggested that most of the reviewed scientific articles on Wikipedia came close to the level of accuracy of Encyclopædia Britannica and had a similar rate of "serious errors."[23] These claims were disputed by Encyclopædia Britannica.[161][162] Nature gave a point-by-point rebuttal of Britannica's argument,[163] but did agree that the structure of Wikipedia's articles was often poor.As a consequence of the open structure, Wikipedia "makes no guarantee of validity" of its content, since no one is ultimately responsible for any claims appearing in it.[164] Concerns have been raised by PC World in xxxx regarding the lack of accountability that results from users' anonymity,[165] the insertion of false information,[166] vandalism, and similar problems.Economist Tyler Cowen wrote: "If I had to guess whether Wikipedia or the median refereed journal article on economics was more likely to be true, after a not so long think I would opt for Wikipedia." He comments that some traditional sources of non-fiction suffer from systemic biases and novel results, in his opinion, are over-reported in journal articles and relevant information is omitted from news reports. However, he also cautions that errors are frequently found on Internet sites, and that academics and experts must be vigilant in correcting them.[167]Critics argue that Wikipedia's open nature and a lack of proper sources for most of the information makes it unreliable.[168] Some commentators suggest that Wikipedia may be reliable, but that the reliability of any given article is not clear.[169] Editors of traditional reference works such as the Encyclopædia Britannica have questioned the project's utility and status as an encyclopedia.[170]Wikipedia's open structure inherently makes it an easy target for Internet trolls, spammers, and those with an agenda to push.[30][171] The addition of political spin to articles by organizations including members of the US House of Representatives and special interest groups[22] has been noted,[172] and organizations such as Microsoft have offered financial incentives to work on certain articles.[173] For example, in August xxxx, the website WikiScanner began to trace the sources of changes made to Wikipedia by anonymous editors without Wikipedia accounts. The program revealed that many such edits were made by corporations or government agencies changing the content of articles related to them, their personnel or their work.[174] These issues have been parodied, notably by Stephen Colbert on The Colbert Report.[175]Because contributors usually rewrite small portions of an entry rather than making full-length revisions, high- and low-quality content may be intermingled within an entry. Roy Rosenzweig, a history professor, stated that American National Biography Online outperformed Wikipedia in terms of its "clear and engaging prose", which, he said, was an important aspect of good historical writing.[176] Contrasting Wikipedia's treatment of Abraham Lincoln to that of Civil War historian James McPherson in American National Biography Online, he said that both were essentially accurate and covered the major episodes in Lincoln's life, but praised "McPherson's richer contextualization [...] his artful use of quotations to capture Lincoln's voice [...] and [...] his ability to convey a profound message in a handful of words." By contrast, he gives an example of Wikipedia's prose that he finds "both verbose and dull". Rosenzweig also criticized the "waffling?encouraged by the npov policy?[which] means that it is hard to discern any overall interpretive stance in Wikipedia history". By example, he quoted the conclusion of Wikipedia's article on William Clarke Quantrill. While generally praising the article, he pointed out its "waffling" conclusion: "Some historians [...] remember him as an opportunistic, bloodthirsty outlaw, while others continue to view him as a daring soldier and local folk hero."[176]Other critics have made similar charges that, even if Wikipedia articles are factually accurate, they are often written in a poor, almost unreadable style. Frequent Wikipedia critic Andrew Orlowski commented: "Even when a Wikipedia entry is 100 per cent factually correct, and those facts have been carefully chosen, it all too often reads as if it has been translated from one language to another then into to a third, passing an illiterate translator at each stage."[177] A study of cancer articles by Yaacov Lawrence of the Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University found that the entries were mostly accurate, but they were written at college reading level, as distinct from the ninth-grade level seen in the Physician Data Query. This Lawrence study of oncology articles was limited to those Wikipedia articles which could be found in the Physician Data Query and did not evaluate Wikipedia articles written at the "start" class or the "stub" class level, which are generally not classified or graded by either college standards or Wikipedia gradations of quality. Of the oncology articles reviewed by him, Lawrence said that "Wikipedia's lack of readability (to non-college readers) may reflect its varied origins and haphazard editing".[178] The Economist argued that better-written articles tend to be more reliable: "inelegant or ranting prose usually reflects muddled thoughts and incomplete information".[179]Wikipedia seeks to create a summary of all human knowledge in the form of an online encyclopedia, with each topic covered encyclopedically in one article. Since it has terabytes of disk space, it can have far more topics than can be covered by any printed encyclopedia.[180] The exact degree and manner of coverage on Wikipedia is under constant review by its editors, and disagreements are not uncommon (see deletionism and inclusionism).[181][182] Wikipedia contains materials that some people may find objectionable, offensive, or pornographic because Wikipedia is not censored. The policy has sometimes proved controversial: in xxxx, Wikipedia rejected an online petition against the inclu
&#xxxx; Location: Baton Rouge
&#xxxx; Post ID: xxxx693 batonrouge
&#xxxx; Other ads by this user:
Skillet & Third Day Concert at CenturyLink Center - LA in Bossier City, LA Tickets (Best VIP Concert Tickets) buy, sell, trade: tickets for sale
Buy Concert Tickets For Jason Aldean at Tiger Stadium - Baton Rouge buy, sell, trade: tickets for sale
Jason Aldean Concert Tickets in Baton Rouge at Tiger Stadium - Baton Rouge buy, sell, trade: tickets for sale
Buy Concert Tickets For Jason Aldean at CenturyLink Center - LA (Concert on Thursday, January 9, xxxx) buy, sell, trade: tickets for sale
Miley Cyrus "Bangerz" Tour xxxx Concert Schedule & Tickets at New Orleans Arena (VIP Fan Packages - Meet & Greet Tickets) buy, sell, trade: tickets for sale
//
//]]>
Email this ad
Play it safe. Avoid Scammers.
Most of the time, transactions outside of your local area involving money orders, cashier checks, wire transfers or shipping (especially overseas shipping) are scams or frauds.
Report all scam attempts to abuse@backpage.com.
//
//]]>
Account Login | Affiliate Program | Promote Us | Help | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | User Safety | backpage.com  © Copyright xxxx
batonrouge.backpage.com is an interactive computer service that enables access by multiple users and should not be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.
Bayou Country Superfest - 3 Day Pass
Tiger Stadium - Baton Rouge
Baton Rouge, LA
Friday
5/23/xxxx
TBD
View Best Concert Tickets
This will be George's last major concert tour. After decades of touring he is retiring from the road. If you are a George Strait fan this will be your last chance to catch George live on tour. During his retirement George will still play select events but they will be very limited. Don't miss this icon of country music, OnlineTicketWindow.com has great seats for this entire xxxx Farewell Tour on sale now. All transactions are secure and guaranteed.
George Strait xxxx Farewell Concert Tour Schedule & Tickets
George Strait & Jason Aldean
CenturyLink Center - LA
Bossier City, LA
Thursday
1/9/xxxx
7:30 PM
View Best Concert Tickets
George Strait & Jason Aldean
Frank Erwin Center
Austin, TX
Friday
1/10/xxxx
7:30 PM
View Best Concert Tickets
George Strait & Eric Church
CenturyLink Center Omaha
Omaha, NE
Friday
1/17/xxxx
7:30 PM
View Best Concert Tickets
George Strait & Eric Church
Sprint Center
Kansas City, MO
Saturday
1/18/xxxx
7:30 PM
View Best Concert Tickets
George Strait & Martina McBride
SAP Center
San Jose, CA
Thursday
1/30/xxxx
7:30 PM
View Best Concert Tickets
George Strait & Miranda Lambert
Valley View Casino Center (Formerly San Diego Sports Arena)
San Diego, CA
Friday
1/31/xxxx
7:30 PM
View Best Concert Tickets
George Strait & Miranda Lambert
MGM Grand Garden Arena
Las Vegas, NV
Saturday
2/1/xxxx
8:00 PM
View Best Concert Tickets
George Strait & Martina McBride
US Airways Center
Phoenix, AZ
Friday
2/7/xxxx
7:30 PM
View Best Concert Tickets
George Strait & Martina McBride
Staples Center
Los Angeles, CA
Saturday
2/8/xxxx
7:30 PM
View Best Concert Tickets
George Strait & Little Big Town
Palace Of Auburn Hills
Auburn Hills, MI
Friday
2/14/xxxx
7:30 PM
View Best Concert Tickets
George Strait & Little Big Town
Nationwide Arena
Columbus, OH
Saturday
2/15/xxxx
7:30 PM
View Best Concert Tickets
George Strait & Martina McBride
Wells Fargo Center - PA
Philadelphia, PA
Friday
2/28/xxxx
7:30 PM
View Best Concert Tickets
George Strait & Martina McBride
Prudential Center
Newark, NJ
Saturday
3/1/xxxx
7:30 PM
View Best Concert Tickets
George Strait & Vince Gill
KFC Yum! Center
Louisville, KY
Friday
3/7/xxxx
7:30 PM
View Best Concert Tickets
George Strait & Vince Gill
Allstate Arena
Rosemont, IL
Saturday
3/8/xxxx
7:30 PM
View Best Concert Tickets
George Strait & Sheryl Crow
Bridgestone Arena (Formerly Sommet Center)
Nashville, TN
Friday
3/21/xxxx
8:00 PM
View Best Concert Tickets
George Strait & Sheryl Crow
Philips Arena
Atlanta, GA
Saturday
3/22/xxxx
7:30 PM
View Best Concert Tickets
George Strait, Lee Ann Womack & Merle Haggard
INTRUST Bank Arena
Wichita, KS
Friday
4/4/xxxx
7:30 PM
View Best Concert Tickets
George Strait, Lee Ann Womack & Merle Haggard
Pepsi Center - Denver
Denver, CO
Saturday
4/5/xxxx
7:30 PM
View Best Concert Tickets
George Strait & Chris Young
Moda Center at the Rose Quarter
Portland, OR
Friday
4/11/xxxx
7:30 PM
View Best Concert Tickets
George Strait & Chris Young
Tacoma Dome
Tacoma, WA
Saturday
4/12/xxxx
7:30 PM
View Best Concert Tickets
George Strait & Ronnie Dunn
Wells Fargo Arena - IA
Des Moines, IA
Friday
4/18/xxxx
7:30 PM
View Best Concert Tickets
George Strait & Ronnie Dunn
Bank Of Oklahoma Center
Tulsa, OK
Saturday
4/19/xxxx
7:30 PM
View Best Concert Tickets
Bayou Country Superfest - 3 Day Pass
Tiger Stadium - Baton Rouge
Baton Rouge, LA
Friday
5/23/xxxx
TBD
View Best Concert Tickets
Bayou Country Superfest: George Strait, Reba McEntire & Chris Young
Tiger Stadium - Baton Rouge
Baton Rouge, LA
Friday
5/23/xxxx
6:00 PM
View Best Concert Tickets
George Strait, Tim McGraw & Faith Hill
Gillette Stadium
Foxborough, MA
Saturday
5/31/xxxx
7:30 PM
View Best Concert Tickets
George Strait, Alan Jackson, Kenny Chesney & Faith Hill
AT&T Stadium
Arlington, TX
Saturday
6/7/xxxx
TBD
View Best Concert Tickets